EXCESSIVE TENSION FOR SO MANY EXPERIENCE

TOO MUCH WHISTLE FOR FEW LACKS

Without being a party excessively complicated in spite of the great thing that there were playing both equipments, O'Leary mostro an edginess to the beginning of the party of which we are not accustomed, indicating excessive lacks in banal throws of the game, what I reduce fluency to the party. Certain it is that not cometio mistakes of bundle, but not transmitio the necessary safety in an umpire of his experience. Scarcely I apply the Advantage rule, which always favorecia to the offender of the same one.

MANY CARDS, FEW USEFULNESS

In the second part one saw with mas aplomb in the direction of the party, but I stop him to go for the excessive need to use the cards to support the control of the party, a control that from the first minute already tape-worm since the players behaved like debian. Six admonitions in a party of 24 lacks denote that: one, could not value of suitable form the infractions, or two, that those who mostro were excessive.

VOLUNTARY HAND.... IF OR NOT?

In the minute 24 of the first half there took place one of these plays that do not make anybody indifferent and that in addition it does not put of I remind none of us: the existence of a hand on the part of a Portuguese defender inside his penalty area. Here the discussion exists of if it was or not voluntary, if it was occupying an unreal space ..... to my humble judgment, in spite of that the arm was separated from the body, the Portuguese player did not have intention of touching the ball with the arm, but it was the ball that I affect his arm, valuing you prop small distance between both players and the speed that was taking the ball. Therefore, I understand that the decision not to sanction is a correct interpretation on the part of the New Zealander.