Calls: no need for a penalty, but should study fouls and advantage rule.
9
Neutrality:
8
Style:
8.3
General assessment
Penalty for Portugal ?!, no, no, i agreed with Cakir that Norwegian pushed the ball before portugese could have shot. That was fair. Cakir doesnt like applying advantage if it is not an obvious goal attempt. It seems to be his style. On card issue: Yes, he could give some YCs. On the other hand, willingness of players to play football and fair play environment made him step back and watch. We know that he never hesitates to give cards whenever needed.
Control: It seems that he was afraid of loosing the control of the game. Opted to just mark what was sure, missing many cases. Had situations where he could have shown yellow.
6
Calls: missed some fouls for both sides, some wrong advantage situations not given. In thee 83 i believe there is enough reason for a penalty for the portuguese team.
8
Neutrality: was ok.
7
Style: he is capable of better.
7
General assessment
a game with just a few reasons of interest and Cakir could have done a better job. That advantage rule he wasn't consistent.
Control: not bad, but tolerated too much dissent at times
7
Calls: ok overall
8
Neutrality:
7
Style:
7.3
General assessment
He tried very hard (maybe a little too hard) to get this match trough without issuing any cards. He succeeded, but i am not sure, if this is the best attitude.